Novabone Sinus Blue 2017 6011e15f01944

Current concepts in dental bone grafting materials

Jan. 27, 2021
Dr. Lou Shuman discusses the merits of a new synthetic bone grafting putty—a bioactive glass material with calcium phosphosilicate as the active ingredient—and the evidence-based research backing its efficacy.
The continued growth of dental implant procedures in the United States has also had a positive effect on the utilization of dental bone grafting materials. It is estimated that up to 50% of dental implant procedures involve some form of bone grafting.1 There is also growing use of bone graft materials for the treatment of post-placement bone loss around implants from the destructive inflammatory process known as peri-implantitis.

Over the 100-year history of bone replacement in the human body for various purposes, a wide variety of surgical approaches and materials have been used.2 While autogenous bone from the patient remains the gold standard given all of the inherent growth factors, harvesting the bone may require a secondary surgical site, which is often undesirable from the patient’s perspective.

Given their efficacy and availability, many clinicians use off-the-shelf solutions that can include allografts (cadaveric bone from the same species), xenografts (typically produced from bovine or porcine sources from different species), or synthetic materials. The application of these materials in dental implantology is widespread and covers site preparation (e.g., localized ridge augmentation, grafting extraction sockets, and maxillary sinus augmentation), the treatment of peri-implant defects at the time of placement (e.g., fenestrations and dehiscence defects), and treating bone loss around integrated implants as a result of peri-

implantitis, functional overload, trapped subgingival cement, or a combination of factors. These grafting materials can also be used in a variety of nonimplant procedures including grafting around natural teeth with bone loss, filling extraction sockets for ridge preservation, or treating localized bone defects as a result of trauma or infection.

There are numerous products in each of the grafting categories that have evidence-based research supporting their efficacy. This has led some companies to look at alternative means of differentiating the product. One such example is the synthetic bone graft putty from NovaBone Products, LLC. The NovaBone Putty is a bioactive glass material with calcium phosphosilicate as the active ingredient (70% by volume). The material is radiopaque, has no risk of disease transmission given its synthetic origin, and has been shown to be osteostimulatory, meaning the graft helps accelerate bone formation in part due to the localized release of calcium and phosphate ions that play a role in the recruitment and formation of bone-forming cells (osteoblasts).3

But the delivery system is what makes this product truly unique. While available in traditional syringe and clam-shell configurations, NovaBone Putty is the only bone graft material available in a cartridge configuration. Expressed with a dispenser, clinicians will be familiar with this delivery technique as it is similar to

that used with impression and restorative materials. The putty consistency delivered via the cartridge cannula allows for very precise placement in difficult-to-reach defects or in specialized indications such as the minimally invasive crestal approach to sinus augmentation. Unlike particulate bone graft, the putty will not “wash out” of the site in the presence of blood or irrigation. During the healing process, the binder/carrier materials are resorbed, leaving a scaffold for the formation of new bone. Over a longer time period, the bioactive glass particles are resorbed and replaced by host bone.

NovaBone products are exclusively distributed in the US and Canada by Osteogenics Biomedical.

Editor’s note: This article first appeared in Through the Loupes newsletter, a publication of the Endeavor Business Media Dental Group. Read more articles at this link and subscribe here.

References

  1. Cha HS, Kim JW, Hwang JH, Ahn KM. Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;38(1):19. doi:10.1186/s40902-016-0064-2
  2. Horowitz RA, Leventis MD, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Bone grafting: history, rationale, and selection of materials and techniques. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2014;35(4 Suppl):1-6.
  3. Profeta AC, Prucher GM. Bioactive-glass in periodontal surgery and implant dentistry. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(5):559-571. doi:10.4012/dmj.2014-233

Lou Shuman, DMD, CAGS, is the CEO of Cellerant Consulting Group, a leading dental corporate incubator and accelerator. He is a venturer-in-residence at Harvard’s i-Lab, the chairman of the technology advisory board at WEO Media, a member of the editorial advisory board of Dental Economics, and founder of the Cellerant Best of Class Technology Awards.

About the Author

Lou Shuman, DMD, CAGS

Lou Shuman, DMD, CAGS, is the CEO of Cellerant Consulting Group, a leading dental corporate incubator and accelerator. He is a venturer-in-residence at Harvard’s i-Lab, the chairman of the technology advisory board at WEO Media, a member of the editorial advisory board of Dental Economics, and founder of the Cellerant Best of Class Technology Awards.